Legal Opinion

Snouffer v. Cedar Rapids & Marion City Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 28, 1902PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Linn District Court. — Hon. Wm. G. Thompson, Judge. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

The facts essential to an understanding of this controversy may be stated as follows:

For many years prior to 1879, a public highway connected the 'cities of Oedar Eapids and Marion. Beginning as early at least as the year 1874, the property owners along that portion of said route now under consideration dedicated or attempted to dedicate additional land to the public for the use of said highway, making it 120 feet in width, and as thus enlarged such highway was thereafter known as “The Boulevard” and later as “First Avenue.” In the year 1879, a corporation formed for that purpose undertook…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Beer Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Stone v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Fertilizing Co. v. Hyde ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Newton v. CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co. v. City of South BendSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Huston v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  3. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co. v. City of South BendIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Star Transportation Co. v. City of Mason CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1923

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API