Legal Opinion · Dissent

Honolulu Ltd. v. Cain

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 8, 1966No. [No. 245, September Term, 1966.]Published

1Dissent

Marbtjry, J.,

filed the following dissenting opinion, in which Horney and McWieliams, JJ., concurred.

I cannot agree with the majority that there was sufficient evidence to go to the jury on the issue of the defendant’s primary negligence. I am of the opinion that the plaintiffs failed to produce evidence legally sufficient to prove the breach of the duty of exercising ordinary care in the maintenance of its parking lot owed by the defendant to the plaintiffs, which resulted in Margaret Cain’s injuries.

On February 27, 1964, the plaintiffs were driven to the shopping center, which they had…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Smith v. BernfeldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  2. Moulden v. Greenbelt Consumer Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  3. Fitzsimons v. National Tea Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  4. Dickey v. Hochschild, Kohn & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  5. Lexington Market Authority v. ZappalaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API