In the Interest of L.N.M.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by Justice WHITTINGTON.
In this case, we must determine whether the trial judge erred in denying Miriam and Ronald Miller’s March 7, 2005 bill of review. Because we conclude the trial judge did not err, we affirm the trial court’s April 7, 2005 order denying the Millers’ bill of review.
Background
The Millers are the parents of nine children who were the subjects of a termination suit filed by the Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services. In an order dated February 20, 2004, the trial judge dismissed three of the children (L.N.M., M.N.M., and A.J.M.) from the suit…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Baker v. GoldsmithTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Harris v. Moore, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
3Cited by11 opinions
- In the Interest of E.R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Charles Haskell, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
- Christopher Michael Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
- In Re LNM, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
- In the Interest of J.B., a Child v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.