Legal Opinion

Bujtas v. Henningsen Foods Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 8, 1974No. 73 Civ. 1783PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BRIEANT, District Judge.

In this diversity action, citizens of Florida seek to recover damages from New York corporations for the wrongful death of their sons which resulted from an automobile accident in the State of Georgia. Plaintiffs, fathers of the decedents, were duly qualified as administrators in Dade County, Florida.

By this motion pursuant to Rule 15, F.R.Civ.P., plaintiffs seek to amend their complaint so as to conform expressly to requirements of the Georgia wrongful death statute on which their cause of action is based. Section 105-1307 of the Georgia Code…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Middle Atlantic Utilities Co. v. S. M. W. Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  3. Green v. Wolf Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  4. Lonnie Miller, Administrator of the Estate of Albert Miller, Jr., Deceased and Albert Miller, Sr. v. Ely J. Perry, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
  5. Wiener v. Specific Pharmaceuticals, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Giroir v. South Louisiana Medical Center, Division of HospitalsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
  2. Giroir v. SOUTH LA. MEDICAL CTR., ETC.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
  3. Matranga v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Hermo v. Amerisure Mutual Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API