Legal Opinion

Hammonds v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 28, 2003No. A03A1266PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

A jury found James Anthony Hammonds guilty of the false imprisonment of K. H., the simple battery of K. H. by “hitting her in the arms, back, and face,” and the obstruction of her placing a 911 call. On appeal, Hammonds challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and the court’s charge on simple battery. Because there was sufficient evidence to support his convictions and no reversible error in the contested charge, we affirm.

1. Hammonds challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. On appeal from a criminal conviction, this court views the evidence in the light most favorable to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Dukes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  3. Grier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  4. Eberhart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  5. Lyman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  2. Ferrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  3. Pierce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  4. Alfredo Nicolas Talamantes-Enriquez v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
  5. Lopez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API