Hood v. Smedley
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONNOR, Justice.
In this appeal from the denial of a writ of habeas corpus we are asked to decide two questions: whether the appellant’s conviction for reckless driving under AS 28.35.040 must be voided because appellant, an indigent, was not afforded counsel at state expense, and whether his incarcera tion because of his inability to pay the $300 fine imposed was a denial of equal protection of the law.
Appellant entered'a plea of guilty in district court to the reckless driving charge. He was sentenced to 90 days imprisonment and a fine of $1,000. Seventy-five days and $700 were…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Tate v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- In Re AntazoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. De BonisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- Fresneda v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gilbert v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1983
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Lominac v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983