Legal Opinion

Statter v. Statter

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 16, 1957PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.

On February 16, 1953 Humphrey Statter commenced an action for separation against his wife, Amy Statter, charging cruelty and abandonment. An extension of time to answer was granted the wife on her attorney’s representation that further time was required to establish the existence of a prior marriage by the husband, the fact of which would serve as a defense and basis for affirmative relief in the separation action. Despite this extension, however, when the answer was filed it. contained neither affirmative defense nor counterclaim. Instead, the wife’s pleading admitted the marriage’s validity…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Last Chance Mining Co. v. Tyler Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Pray v. . HegemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1885

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Gramatan Home Investors Corp. v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Reilly v. ReidNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Purcell v. Bellinger Ex Rel. A.G.B.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Chisholm-Ryder Co. v. Sommer & SommerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  5. Clarke Baridon, Inc., and Cross-Appellant v. Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API