Calhoun v. Stark, Guardian

OX MOTIOX FOR REHEARIXG-.

FLY, Associate Justice.

— There being no assignment copied in the brief that presents the error complained of in the first ground on the motion for rehearing, it cannot be entertained.

We are of the opinion that if there was error in rendering a judgment for the rent of 1893 (all that is complained of in the brief of appellant), appellant was not injured by it, for the reason that he received credit for sums expended in improvements on the place that he was not entitled to, and the judgment against him should have been for a larger amount than it was. Upon what…