Legal Opinion

(HC) Iseli v. Lynch

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 9, 2024No. 2:24-cv-00837Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRANDEN WILLIE ISELI, No. 2:24-cv-00837 WBS SCR P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 JEFF LYNCH, 15 Respondent. 16 17 18 Petitioner, state prisoner, proceeds pro se. Petitioner filed an application for a writ of 19 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and the court ordered respondent to file a response to 20 the petition. (ECF Nos. 1, 6.) Respondent filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 11.) Respondent 21 argues (1) the petition is unsigned and unverified; (2) petitioner failed to use the proper form;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Edgar M. Hendricks v. Daniel Vasquez, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Deutscher v. AngeloneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Dixon v. ClarkDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API