Legal Opinion
Dotzler v. New York City Employees' Retirement System
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 12, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent, New York City Employees’ Retirement System (NYCERS), dated July 8, 2004, which denied the petitioner’s application for accident disability retirement benefits pursuant to Retirement and Social Security Law § 605-b, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (E Rivera, J.), dated August 5, 2005, which denied the petition, and, in effect, dismissed the proceeding.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The Board of Trustees of the respondent, New York City Employees’…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Borenstein v. New York City Employees' Retirement SystemNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Meyer v. Board of TrusteesNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Santoro v. Board of TrusteesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Imbriale v. Board of Trustees of New York City Employees' Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Ramsey v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by2 opinions
- Vargas v. New York City Employees' Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Vargas v. New York City Employees' Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012