Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 14, 1950No. 16923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

1. The first two grounds of the amended motion assert error in the admission of testimony, but omit to specify the testimony and fail to show what objection was made to its introduction. Under repeated rulings of this court, such is not a proper assignment of error and cannot be considered. Hassell & Powell v. Woodstock Iron Works, 137 Ga. 636 (1) (73 S. E. 1052); Georgia & Florida Railway Co. v. Stapleton, 143 Ga. 46 (1, 2) (84 S. E. 120); Clifton v. State, 187 Ga. 502 (3) (2 S. E. 2d, 102); McCrary v. Salmon, 192 Ga. 313 (2) (15 S. E. 2d, 442); Huntsinger v.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Clifton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Huntsinger v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  3. Rouse v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  4. Brannon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  5. Shepherd v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Miller v. ColemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  2. Overby v. VernerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  3. Veasey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
  4. Miller v. ColemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API