Legal Opinion

United States v. Marsh

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided June 29, 1981No. NMCM 80 1281PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UPON RECONSIDERATION

2Per curiam

The United States, pursuant to Rule 20, Rules of Practice and Procedure, Courts of Military Review, has moved for reconsideration of the remedy directed by the Court in this case. The Court by separate order dated 16 June 1981, has granted the motion.

Upon reconsideration we modify the remedy to authorize a rehearing limited only to determining the factual circumstances bearing on jurisdiction, which inquiry was precluded by the ex post facto application by the military judge, of Article 2, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) 10 U.S. C.A. § 802, amendments at the…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. MarshU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. MarshUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  2. United States v. FairchildU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API