State ex rel. Slattery v. Burditt
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LOWENSTEIN, Presiding Judge.
This action for prohibition under Rule 97 involves the attorney-client privilege and the *763work product exception in the context of an inspection, via discover)', of all the files of an attorney representing the employer in a workers’ compensation claim. The claimant is being criminally prosecuted for fraud under § 287.128, RSMo 1994, and now seeks to discover the complete file of his employer’s attorney as an aid in his criminal defense.
Slattery, the relator, represents J.B. Hunt Transport in a claim for compensation filed by Donald Ethridge. Slattery and his firm…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Great American Insurance Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- State v. YatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Lee v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005