Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Slattery v. Burditt

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1995No. WD 51091PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LOWENSTEIN, Presiding Judge.

This action for prohibition under Rule 97 involves the attorney-client privilege and the *763work product exception in the context of an inspection, via discover)', of all the files of an attorney representing the employer in a workers’ compensation claim. The claimant is being criminally prosecuted for fraud under § 287.128, RSMo 1994, and now seeks to discover the complete file of his employer’s attorney as an aid in his criminal defense.

Slattery, the relator, represents J.B. Hunt Transport in a claim for compensation filed by Donald Ethridge. Slattery and his firm…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. State v. CarterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  3. State Ex Rel. Great American Insurance Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  4. State v. YatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  5. Lee v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API