Legal Opinion

Ralston Assignee v. Bell

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 1, 1796PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

2 U.S. 242

2 Dall. 242

1 L.Ed. 365

Ralston Assignee

v.

Bell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

March Term, 1796

1

This was an action for money had and received, &c. brought by Ralston, as assignee of Dewhurst, a bankrupt, against the defendant, who had sold goods of the bankrupt, by virtue of an authority from him; but, it appeared in evidence, that no money had been received by the defendant, at the time of commencing the action.

2

The counsel for the defendant (Ingersoll, Lewis & Dallas) objected, that, on this evidence, the present action could not be maintained.

3

The counsel for the plaintiff (Rawle &…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ruston's Executors v. RustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1796
  2. Ralston v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1796

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Neilson v. BlightNew York Supreme Court · 1799

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API