Legal Opinion

Sanford v. Rowley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1892PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion by both parties for retaxation of costs. at the sum of $461.50. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Per curiam

This is a motion for retaxation of costs. They Avere taxed by the clerk of this Court at the sum of $579.05, although the original bill as presented for taxation amounted to the sum of $753.70. The bill is made up largely of the cost of printing the record, copy procured for printing, and stenographer’s fees. Both parties move for retaxation.

We think, as said in the opinion filed in the case, that the record could have been made up in 100 pages instead *510of 700. The court below, however, certified that all the evidence given on the trial had been incorporated in the bill of exceptions at the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. George W. Roby Lumber Co. v. GrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Van Deusen v. NewcomerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wuerth v. StiversMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API