Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Ankeny

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1915No. 12210PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for King county, Ronald, J., entered July 6, 1914, in favor of the defendant, revising an assessment roll, in pursuance of a mandate of the supreme court on appeal from confirmation of the assessment.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

This is the second appeal touching a special assessment roll made by the eminent domain commissioners of the city of Seattle. The opinion on the first appeal, In re West Wheeler Street, 77 Wash. 3, 137 Pac. 303, presents a full statement as to the physical conditions of the district. It there appears that the district included two physically separate improvements, one consisting of a roadway leading from Fifteenth avenue, west, to Seventeenth avenue, west, located on what is there designated as the “lowlands” and not benefiting the “highlands” on Magnolia Bluff, the other an overhead roadway…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re Westlake AvenueWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. City of Seattle v. Sylvester-Cowen Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. In re West Wheeler StreetWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. State ex rel. Wolf v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Shilshole AvenueWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Strelau v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. New England Land Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. In re Empire WayWashington Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API