Legal Opinion

City of San Antonio v. Kuykendall

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided March 9, 1988No. 04-87-00457-CVPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GERALD T. BISSETT, Assigned Justice * .

This is an appeal from the granting of a summary judgment in favor of Joe Kuyk-endall, Gilbert Zepeda, and Robert Raben-aldt, plaintiffs in the trial court and appel-lees in this Court, and the denial of a summary judgment in favor of the City of San Antonio, defendant in the trial court and appellant in this Court. We affirm.

The sole issue before this Court is the interpretation of TEX.REV.CIV.STAT. ANN. art. 1269m, § 26(e), hereinafter referred to as “§ 26(e),” 1 which, in pertinent part stated:

Provided that all such cities coming under the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jessen Associates, Inc. v. BullockTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Satterfield v. SatterfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Hopkins v. Spring Independent School Dist.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  4. City of Lubbock v. GoodwinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Round Rock v. Whiteaker, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
  2. Bell v. City of Grand Prairie, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
  3. Bell v. CITY OF GRAND PRAIRIE, TEXAS, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005
  4. City of Round Rock and Round Rock Fire Chief Larry Hodge v. Mark Whiteaker, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
  5. City of Round Rock and Round Rock Fire Chief Larry Hodge v. Mark Whiteaker, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API