Legal Opinion
Spahn v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 4, 2007PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Senior Judge McCloskey.
This case involves the consolidated appeals of Gary Spahn (Spahn) from separate but identical orders of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (trial court), granting the motion to quash filed on behalf of R.G. Woodstock Associates, LLC. (Woodstock) and dismissing Spahn’s appeal for lack of standing. We now affirm.
Woodstock is the owner of two vacant lots located at 1630 and 1632 Bainbridge Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. These lots are in an area zoned R-10 Residential District. In June of 2005, Woodstock filed two separate applications with the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Philadelphia v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Pennsylvanians Against Gambling Expansion Fund, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Cali v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- City of Philadelphia v. SchweikerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Ortiz v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Spahn v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Goode v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Thompson v. ZON. HEAR. BD. OF HORSHAM TP.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Society Created to Reduce Urban Blight (Scrub) v. Zoning Hearing Board of Adjustment of the City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Armstead v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.