Kiehl v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYNER, Chief Judge.
Donald T. Kiehl appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated (DWI), arguing that the district court should have suppressed the results of Kiehl’s breath test because the officer who arrested Kiehl did not afford Kiehl a reasonable opportunity to consult privately with his attorney. We affirm.
Trooper Rae Arno arrested Kiehl for DWI and took him to the Tok trooper station for processing. As was her usual practice, Amo kept an audiotape recorder running throughout Kiehl’s processing. She placed the recorder on a table near the telephone. After Arno read Kiehl…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Copelin v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Farrell v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1984
- Municipality of Anchorage v. MarrsCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
- Reekie v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1990
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- Mangiapane v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1999
- Alexander v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2000
- Alexander v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2000
- Alexander v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.