Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Damrich v. Damrich

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 21, 2014No. 2130494Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partThompson, Presiding Judge

The trial court awarded Lauren L. Dam-rich (“the wife”) rehabilitative alimony in the amount of $2,500 a month for two years and reserved the issue of periodic alimony. I believe that, given the facts of this cáse, the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to award the wife periodic alimony from the outset.

Rehabilitative alimony and periodic alimony serve two distinct purposes. Rehabilitative alimony is intended to provide support for a dependent spouse for a limit*883ed period of reeducation or retraining following a divorce so that the dependent spouse may gain skills to become…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stone v. StoneCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  2. Taylor v. TaylorCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  3. Shewbart v. ShewbartCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  4. Ex Parte ElliottSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Edwards v. EdwardsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API