Legal Opinion
Di Camillo v. Navitsky
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 27, 1977PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMorton B. Silberman, J.
Defendant moves for an order canceling and discharging of record a certain notice of mechanic’s lien filed by plaintiff, upon the grounds that the description of the liened premises is erroneous (Lien Law, § 19, subd [6]).
The subject notice of lien describes the premises as follows:
"(7.) The property subject to the lien is situated in the Town of Southeast, County of Putnam, State of New York, shown and designated as Lot #1 on a certain map entitled 'Subdivision Plat Bassett-I’ Town of Southeast, Putnam County, New York, dated 4-23-75 and amended 5-19-75 and 12-12-75 and filed in the office…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hurley v. TuckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Jannotta v. Noslac Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- In re Jory Construction Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1956
- Hurley v. . TuckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Oster v. TownsendNew York Supreme Court · 1961
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dember Construction Corp. v. P & R Electric Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Metivier v. SarandreaNew York Supreme Court · 1992
- MXP Realty Corp. v. AngrisaniNew York Supreme Court · 1991