Legal Opinion
Casimiro v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 27, 1990No. 87-247PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
557 So.2d 223 (1990)
Jose CASIMIRO, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 87-247.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
February 27, 1990.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Charles M. Fahlbusch, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before NESBITT, COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.
2Per curiam
We conclude that the trial court did not reversibly err by failing to inquire concerning the reasons that the state peremptorily challenged four black jurors from the jury panel.
Subsequent to the exercise of those…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Woods v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- United States v. Fernando Fuentes-CobaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Hair v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- Palmer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Slaughter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Hall ex rel. Hall v. DaeeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Hill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Jordan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.