Legal Opinion

Gantt v. West

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided July 7, 1998No. 97-2252Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM: '

On June 5, 1998, the Court issued a prece-dential order in which the Secretary’s use of an internal VA mailing and distribution process was found to be invalid for the purpose of satisfying the service requirements found in Rule 25 of the Court’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. Gantt v. West, 11 Vet.App. 262 (per curiam order 1998). Aso on June 5, 1998, the Secretary was ordered to inform the Court whether he could comply with Rule 25 of the Court’s Rules of Practice and Procedure in all cases before the Court within 30 days or whether additional time would be required to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tobler v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
  2. Gantt v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API