Legal Opinion
United States v. Thwaites Place Associates
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 23, 1982No. 81 Civ. 5867 (RWS)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on a motion for an order to compel the United States Marshal for the Southern District of New York to accept the bid of movants made at a foreclosure sale. Movants John Dedvukaj (“Dedvukaj”) and Harvey Sorkin (“Sorkin”) contend that Dedvukaj’s tender of certain checks to Deputy United States Marshal Peter-Paul Mihailoff (“Mihailoff”) was in accordance with custom and the Terms of Sale governing the foreclosure sale and that therefore Mihailoff wrongly refused to accept said checks. For the reasons set forth below the motion is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Robert v. Ferry v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Interior, Autrice Copeland Freeman v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Blossom v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Erie Coal & Coke Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United Capital Corp. v. Sapolin Paints, Inc. (In Re Sapolin Paints, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1981
- In re General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Premier Container Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. HayesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- In Re Financial News Network, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Thwaites Place Associates v. Secretary of the United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Ulster Savings Bank v. BashAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- United States v. Thwaites Place AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.