Billig v. Billig
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partW.- Sharp, Judge
I concur with the majority opinion that a finding concerning the former husband’s gross and net income is required before we can gauge the fairness of any alimony award to the former wife. In this case, the former wife postulated that the former husband’s income was $170,000 per year based on a not realized or excess income theory that an inordinate amount of business income was being put back into the rental businesses and not being paid (as it could have been or should have been) to the former husband. The court rejected that amount of imputed earnings, but made no express findings as to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Stodtko v. StodtkoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Webb v. WebbDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Decker v. DeckerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988