Legal Opinion · Concurrence

525 Lancaster Ave Apts, LP v. Berks County Board of Assessment Appeals

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 20, 2015Published

1Concurrence

CONCURRING OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

I join in the thoughtful majority opinion. I write separately to add an additional reason to reject the argument that the unappealed LERTA1 reassessment is “set” and cannot be changed by the Taxpayer’s2 pre-existing assessment appeal.

Berks County, Berks County Board of Assessment Appeals, the Reading School District, and the City of Reading (Taxing Authorities) argue that “even if Taxpayer[’s] [pre-existing] appeal was permitted to go forward and the ... assessment was reduced, it still would not change the LERTA schedule of assessments that the Taxpayer…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lincoln Philadelphia Realty Associates I v. Board of Revision of TaxesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Lincoln Phila. Realty Associates v. BD. OF REVISION OF TAXES OF CITY AND CTY. OF PHILADELPHIASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API