Legal Opinion

Suber v. Smith

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 16, 1964No. 18158PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moss, Justice.

George W- Súber, the appellant herein, brought this action for property damage alleged to have been caused by the actionable negligence and willfulness of Rachel Smith and Billy Smith, the respondents herein. The action stems from an automobile collision which occurred about 10:15 P. M., on September 9, 1962, pn Highway 219, in Newberry County, when an automobile owned by Rachel Smith and driven by her minor brother, Billy Smith, collided with the rear of a Ford automobile owned by the appellant and driven, with his permission, by his minor son, Jerry Súber.

It is stipulated that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rogers Ex Rel. Rogers v. Florence Printing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  2. Jones v. Atlanta-Charlotte Air Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  3. Scott v. Greenville Pharmacy, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  4. Seay v. Southern Ry. &8212 Carolina DivisionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  5. Capital Motor Lines v. GilletteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Broom Ex Rel. Broom v. Southeastern Highway Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  2. Gray Ex Rel. Gray v. BarnesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  3. Chrisley v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1985
  4. Marcum v. BowdenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  5. Adams v. HunterDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API