Legal Opinion

Bostrom v. Nat. Bk. of McKeesport

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 1938No. Appeal, 205PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

To recover on a savings account alleged to have been held by the entireties, the present action of assumpsit was instituted by C. J. Bostrom and wife. After the death of the former it was prosecuted by the wife alone. Defendant resisted the claim of the wife on the ground that the account was not by the entireties. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant following which the court entered judgment for plaintiff n. o. v. This appeal followed.

The decisive evidence on both sides as to the nature of the account is documentary. The account was originally in the name…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Berhalter v. BerhalterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Wilbur Trust Co. v. KnadlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Madden v. Glosztonyi Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Gallagher EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Werle v. WerleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Commonwealth v. Nolan's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Geist v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API