Pupo v. City of Hialeah
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
In this workers’ compensation case, Claimant challenges an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) denying penalties and interest on late indemnity payments. For the reasons set forth herein, we affirm in part and reverse in part.
Sections 440.20(6) and 440.20(8), Florida Statutes, govern penalties and interest, respectively. Because those subsections are substantive, the version that applies is that in effect on the date of accident. See Serv. Mgmt. Sys. v. Hood, 790 So.2d 578, 580 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (applying section 440.20(6)); E. Indus., Inc. v. Burnham, 750 So.2d 748, 749-52…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brown v. Giffen Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1973
- Fitzgerald v. Osceola County School Bd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Mitchell v. XO COMMUNICATIONSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Watson v. Freeman Decorating Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Eastern Industries, Inc. v. BurnhamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- CitiBank, N.A. v. ManningDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Ivan Palma v. American Airlines and, Sedgwick CMSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017