Bentley v. Bentley
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partThomas, Judge
Although I concur in those portions of the main opinion affirming the custody award and the child-support award, I dissent from that portion of the opinion affirming the determination that the interest of Landon Bentley (“the husband”) in the Bentley Family Partnership (“the partnership interest”) is marital property subject to division. Based on my review of the evidence presented at trial, I cannot conclude that the evidence supports a determination that the partnership interest, or income derived from it, was “used regularly for the common benefit of the parties during their marriage” as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Ex Parte DrummondSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Ex Parte DurbinSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- Ex Parte James Wood LamoreauxSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002