Legal Opinion

Dana Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 15, 1997No. 95-676TPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MILLER, Judge.

This case comes before the court after argument on the parties’ cross-motions for partial summary judgment. The issues are 1) whether plaintiff may deduct as an ordinary and necessary business expense a retainer fee paid to a law firm in 1984 and applied towards services rendered in connection with a subsequently occurring capital acquisition and 2) whether plaintiffs subsidiary, a cash-method taxpayer, may deduct prepayments of interest in the year paid.

FACTS

The parties provided a Joint Stipulation from which the following facts are drawn. During tax years 1984 and 1985,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Deputy, Administratrix v. Du PontSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Indopco, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Lucas v. American Code Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. United States v. GilmoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Thor Power Tool Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dana Corporation v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API