Dana Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MILLER, Judge.
This case comes before the court after argument on the parties’ cross-motions for partial summary judgment. The issues are 1) whether plaintiff may deduct as an ordinary and necessary business expense a retainer fee paid to a law firm in 1984 and applied towards services rendered in connection with a subsequently occurring capital acquisition and 2) whether plaintiffs subsidiary, a cash-method taxpayer, may deduct prepayments of interest in the year paid.
FACTS
The parties provided a Joint Stipulation from which the following facts are drawn. During tax years 1984 and 1985,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Deputy, Administratrix v. Du PontSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Indopco, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lucas v. American Code Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
- United States v. GilmoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Thor Power Tool Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dana Corporation v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999