Legal Opinion
Priddy v. School Dist. No. 78, Cotton County
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 3, 1923No. 11505, 11951, and 12289, ConsolidatedPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
'STEPHENSON, C.
The plaintiff in error commenced his action No. 957 in the district court of Cotton county, on June 2, 1919, against sehool district No. 78 et al. for damages growing out of trespass on real estate alleged to be the property of the plaintiff. The plaintiff was denied recovery in the cause, and has brought error to this court, being designated herein as No. 11505. Thereafter, on July 25, 1919, the plaintiff filed his action No. 925 in the district court of the same county against school district No. 78 et al. seeking relief for alleged damages to real estate owned by…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fraley, Adm'r v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Memphis & Charleston Railroad v. NeighborsMississippi Supreme Court · 1875
- Munro v. Syracuse, Lake Shore & Northern RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Riggs v. New CastleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Spect v. GreggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Keaton v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Frensley v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Regular Predestinarian Baptist Church v. ParkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
- Stinson v. Oklahoma Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- The Choctaw and the Chickasaw Nations v. Board of County Commissioners of Love County, Oklahoma, and Texaco, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.