Legal Opinion

Cummings v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 3, 1896No. 860PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Bexar. Tried below before Hon. Robert B. Green. This appeal is from a conviction for swindling, the punishment being assessed at four years’ imprisonment in the penitentiary. No statement necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of swindling, and given four years in the penitentiary, and prosecutes this appeal. A number of errors are assigned, but we will only notice one, as that disposes of the case. The indictment is as follows: The said W. E. Cummings, “by means of false pretenses and devices and fraudulent representations, then and there knowingly and fraudulently made by him to Adolph Cohen, and which false pretenses and devices and fraudulent representations were then and there relied upon by the said Adolph Cohen, did induce the said Adolph Cohen to deliver to him, the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. FisherUtah Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Faulk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  3. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Leon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Farmer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API