Legal Opinion

Doe v. State Ethics Commission

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 18, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.

General Laws c. 268B, § 4 (d), provides that the State Ethics Commission (commission) “may require by summons the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of books, papers, and other records relating to any matter being investigated by it pursuant to [G. L. c. 268B] or [G. L. c. 268A].” We granted the commission’s application for direct appellate review in this case to consider, for the second time, whether the language quoted above authorizes the commission *270to compel an individual who is the subject of a preliminary inquiry into allegations of wrongdoing to appear before the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. Saccone v. State Ethics CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Fafard v. Lincoln Pharmacy of Milford, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  4. Craven v. State Ethics CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Hathaway Bakeries, Inc. v. Labor Relations CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nantasket Beachfront Condominiums, LLC v. Hull Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2015
  2. State Ethics Commission v. DoeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API