Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Rhoads

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided December 3, 1902No. 126PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Trespass, vi et Armis

1Opinion of the Court

Grubb, J.,

charging the jury:

Gentlemen of the jury:—This is an action of trespass for assault and battery wherein the plaintiff seeks damages for injuries committed with direct and immediate violence to his person.

In this case the plaintiff Henry K. Armstrong alleges that the defendant George B. W. Rhoads, on October 19, 1901, committed upon him an assault and battery by striking him with a pitchfork, whereby he the plaintiff was seriously wounded and injured, and by reason thereof he suffered, and from thence hitherto has suffered great pain, and was hindered and prevented from performing and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Corcoran v. HarranWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Wilson v. YoungWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Donnelly v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Osler v. WaltonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wilhelm v. RyanSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API