Legal Opinion

Burnett v. Amalgamated Phosphate Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 24, 1938No. 8735Published

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

This was an action by appellant for the negligent death of her husband. The first trial resulted in a verdict for her, which was set aside. On the second trial, the court directed a verdict for appellee, and this appeal is from the judgment entered thereon.

Appellant’s husband, Elmer N. Burnett, was employed by appellee on and before January 31, 1934, as chemist in its phosphate mining operations at Brewster, Florida. As such chemist he was in complete charge of the laboratory where samp.les of the phosphate were analyzed. This laboratory was housed in a separate building…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Butler v. FrazeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Anderson v. Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
  3. Kuptz v. Ralph Sollitt & Sons Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
  4. Aqua System, Inc. v. KodakoskiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
  5. Central Vermont Ry., Inc. v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API