Legal Opinion

People v. Phillips

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 25, 1968No. Crim. 6526PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, P. J.

On this appeal from the trial court’s order denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis defendant contends that the trial court erred in summarily denying his petition since his allegations as to an induced plea of guilty and as to insanity at the time of trial were sufficient to merit relief.

On'November 30/1966, defendant withdrew his plea of not guilty to violating section 11501 (unlawful sale of narcotics) and entered a plea of guilty to said charge and admitted a prior narcotic conviction. Following his arraignment for judgment and a motion for probation, the district attorney…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. AdamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. People v. ShortsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. People v. ShipmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. WadkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. ButterfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. CortezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. People v. KrausCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. People v. GaytonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. People v. GageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API