Cox v. COASTAL PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1DissentDana, J.
[¶ 14] I respectfully dissent.
[¶ 15] If Timothy Cox had asked to borrow the company track to drive to Wind-ham on a personal errand, no state would award workers’ compensation benefits for his injuries just because he had permission to drive the company truck. The result should be no different merely because immediately prior to the accident Cox had successfully and without accident completed a business delivery to a customer in the opposite direction.
[¶ 16] The hearing officer and the Court reached an opposite result by viewing the business and personal errands as one interconnected trip and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McDaniel v. RitterMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
- Harding v. City of TexarkanaCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
- Harris v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. PrestonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Lockwood v. Board of TrusteesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.