Legal Opinion

People v. Shuman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 31, 1992No. 3—91—0409PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE BARRY

delivered the opinion of the court:

In this case, we address the issue of whether defendant James Shuman knowingly and intelligently pled guilty. Since we find that he did not, we vacate the decision below and remand the cause for further proceedings.

The defendant was initially charged with 11 counts of arson (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 38, par. 20—1). He agreed to plead guilty to all counts in return for the State’s promise not to charge him with aggravated arson. There was no agreement as to the sentences.

At the guilty plea hearing, the trial court informed the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. People v. DidleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. The PEOPLE v. WardIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  4. People v. AkersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  5. People v. MappsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Hampton v. DeTellaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
  2. People v. VasquezAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API