Legal Opinion

Mariano v. CVI Investments, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 20, 2020No. 19-2929Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

19-2929 Mariano v. CVI Investments, Inc. et al UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  2. Danann Realty Corp. v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. Bridgestone/firestone, Inc. v. Recovery Credit Services, Inc., Revenue Recovery, Inc. And George BeladinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  4. Aaron Ferer & Sons Ltd. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, National Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  5. Jana L. v. West 129th Street Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API