Legal Opinion

Eisert v. Adelson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 4, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Laura E. Eisert,. from a final order of the Municipal Court of the city of Mew York, borough of Queens^ rendered on the 22d day of J uly, 1909.

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas, J.:

The proceeding was instituted to dispossess a tenant for failure to pay an installment of rent of $200, due July 1, 1909.' The tenant answered counterclaiming for abatement of the rent, on the ground that he was precluded from taking possession of the premises until May thirtieth, whereas .he was entitled to possession on May fifteenth. The alleged reason for delay in taking, possession was the failure of the landlord to make repairs on the premises. The tenant also charges that the landlord agreed to furnish dishes, and failed in this, to the tenant’s damage in the sum of eight…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. . DeenNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Daly v. PizaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  3. Leeming v. DuryeaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Potter v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  2. Church v. MacNamara, New York County Courts1916
  3. Distributers' Realty Co. v. LevinsohnAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API