Legal Opinion

Craddock v. Oliver

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 19, 1929No. 3 Div. 633PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

Where a judge or a court undertakes to act in a matter in which he or it has no jurisdiction, prohibition is the proper remedy. 32 Cyc. 610 (12); Ex parte Ray et al., 45 Ala. 15.

The power granted to judges of probate by section 9591 of the Code of 1923: “To, grant writs of habeas corpus in those cases in which the power is conferred by law” — is a statutory grant of power to the judge, and not to the probate court. It is as probate judge, and not as a probate court, that he hears and determines petitions for habeas corpus. The court of probate as such is not authorized to grant or hear the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Robertson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Ex Parte BankheadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Ex Parte DuncanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
  4. State Ex Rel. Gaston v. CunninghameSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. Ex parte Ray & DefoeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1871

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McCollum v. Birmingham Post Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  2. Charles Mfg. Co. v. United Furniture WorkersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  3. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  4. American Life Ins. Co. v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  5. Meeks v. Town of HooverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API