Craddock v. Oliver
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.
Where a judge or a court undertakes to act in a matter in which he or it has no jurisdiction, prohibition is the proper remedy. 32 Cyc. 610 (12); Ex parte Ray et al., 45 Ala. 15.
The power granted to judges of probate by section 9591 of the Code of 1923: “To, grant writs of habeas corpus in those cases in which the power is conferred by law” — is a statutory grant of power to the judge, and not to the probate court. It is as probate judge, and not as a probate court, that he hears and determines petitions for habeas corpus. The court of probate as such is not authorized to grant or hear the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Robertson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
- Ex Parte BankheadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Ex Parte DuncanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
- State Ex Rel. Gaston v. CunninghameSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Ex parte Ray & DefoeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1871
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- McCollum v. Birmingham Post Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Charles Mfg. Co. v. United Furniture WorkersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
- American Life Ins. Co. v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Meeks v. Town of HooverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.