Legal Opinion

Charles Miner v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of Wisconsin

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 12, 1956No. 12767PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff-appellant’s complaint in the District Court alleged that a form of insurance policy devised and copyrighted by him had been copied by the appellee. The complaint rested in part at least on the theory that the substance of the coverage given by plaintiff’s policy, namely, insurance against loss from failure to record chattel mortgages and like instruments, cannot be provided by other persons or companies without infringing his copyright. That theory must fail: others remain free to compete by offering similar coverages. See Dorsey v. Old Surety Life Insurance Co., 10 Cir., 1938, 98…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chamberlin v. Uris Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  2. Dorsey v. Old Surety Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
  3. Cain v. Universal Pictures Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1942
  4. Carr v. National Capital Press, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
  5. Smith v. ThompsonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1941

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Richard Bell v. Wilmott Storage Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  2. Continental Casualty Company, Plaintiff-Appellee-Appellant v. Hulbert T. E. Beardsley and H. T. E. Beardsley, Inc., Defendants-Appellants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  3. Continental Casualty Company v. BeardsleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  4. Costello v. Loew's IncorporatedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1958
  5. Lapsley v. American Institute of Certified Public AccountantsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API