Merrick v. Lensing
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CRIST, Presiding Judge.
Action by plaintiffs-respondents (hereinafter “landlocked owners”) to establish a private road across appellant's (hereinafter “servient owner”) land pursuant to §§ 228.-340 to 228.480, RSMo. 1978. We affirm.
The trial court ruled landlocked owners were entitled to a way of strict necessity over servient owner’s land. A jury assessed damages for the taking of the roadway in favor of servient owner in the sum of $7,500.00. All parties appeal.
Servient owner contends there was no strict necessity for the proposed road because he had offered landlocked owners other land on…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Sampson v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Labor Discount Center, Inc. v. State Bank & Trust Co. of WellstonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Donnell v. Vigus Quarries, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Helming v. AdamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- King v. Jack Cooper Transport Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- West v. HinksmonColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- Hamai v. WitthausMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Daniels v. RichardsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988