Legal Opinion
Riley v. Heil Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided September 25, 1985No. C-2-83-166PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KINNEARY, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court to consider the motion of the defendant to stay these proceedings.
This is a products liability action in which the plaintiffs are citizens of Ohio and the defendant, the Heil Company, is a Wisconsin corporation. Defendant is insured by the Ideal Mutual Insurance Company, a New York corporation. Ideal is not a party to the present action.
In February, 1985, Ideal was placed in liquidation in New York and a permanent injunction was issued prohibiting all proceedings against Ideal within the United States. Also in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. Cargill, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Blackhawk Heating & PlumbIng Co. Inc. v. GeeslinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Board of Directors of Wisconsin Ins. SEC. FundDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1983
- Janak v. Allstate Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1970
- Cummings Wholesale Electric Co., Inc. v. Home Owners Insurance Company, James Baylor, and Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Otto Electric Company, Inc., Delphi Community School Building Corp. v. Northeastern Insurance Company of HartfordCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gerald Grimes v. Crown Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Grimes v. Crown Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988