Legal Opinion

Murray v. Midland Funding, LLC

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 26, 2017No. 2280/15Published

1Opinion of the CourtFriedman , J.

Debt buyers purchase consumer debt at deep discount, obtain judgments, and try to collect on those judgments. Md. Code Ann., Business Regulation Article § 7-301 (2015). In 2010, the Maryland State Collection Agency Licensing Board clarified that these debt buyers fall within the definition of collection agencies and, therefore, must have a license before engaging in debt collecting. Md. State Collection Agency Licensing Bd. Advisory Notice 05-10, May 5, 2010 (quoted in Finch v. LVNV Funding, 212 Md.App. 748 , 758, 71 A.3d 193 (2013)); see also Cain v. Midland Funding, 452 Md. 141 , 147-48,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. One Toshiba Color Television Two Answering MacHines One Health Tech Computer Reginald McGlory in No. 98-3578 (Pursuant to Rule 12(a), f.r.a.p.) (d.c. Civ. No. 90-Cv-00138) United States of America v. Assorted Jewelry Reginald McGlory in No. 98-3579 (Pursuant to Rule 12(a), f.r.a.p.) (d.c. Civ. No. 90-Cv-00370)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. State Center, LLC v. Lexington Charles Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  3. Bowen v. City of AnnapolisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. Koons Ford of Baltimore, Inc. v. LobachCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Cain v. Midland Funding, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API