Legal Opinion

Marriage of Bougie v. Bougie

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 5, 1993No. C3-92-1679PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPECIAL TERM OPINION

ANDERSON, Chief Judge.

FACTS

An amended judgment and decree in the parties’ dissolution action was entered on March 5, 1992 (March judgment). Notice of entry of the March judgment was served on appellant on May 5, 1992. Two weeks later, appellant filed a timely motion to amend the March judgment. The trial court denied appellant’s motion to amend by an order dated June 26, 1992 (June order). Respondent served notice of filing of the June order upon respondent on August 3, 1992. Appellant filed this appeal from the June order on September 2, 1992.

In the meantime, on July 2,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marriage of Kelly v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Kempf v. KempfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Disciplinary Hearing Regarding the Peace Officer License of WoollettCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  2. Marriage of Bouton v. BoutonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Clark v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  4. Marriage of Doty v. DotyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API