Legal Opinion

Wish v. Pacific States Life Ins.

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided September 13, 1935No. 502-DPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff, as beneficiary, sues upon a life insurance policy, and defendant, through a duly appointed qualified receiver, moves to stay proceedings. This receiver was appointed by the director of insurance and qualified in the superior court of Cook county, outside of this District, subsequent to the institution of this suit, and that court, in approving the appointment, enjoined all creditors and parties in interest from interfering with the assets belonging to the defendant corporation. Plaintiff was not a party to the suit, and does not at the present time seek to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Assn. v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Prout v. StarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Williams v. NeelyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  5. Central National Bank v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Taylor v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API