French v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Chief Justice Sampson—
Affirming.
Appellants, Prendí, Parmer and Casteel, were indicted and convicted in the Madison circuit court of the offense of unlawfully having in possession intoxicating liquors. Their motion and grounds for new trial being overruled they prosecute this appeal relying upon four grounds: (1) absence of evidence showing appellants' guilt; (2) only one of the defendants could have been guilty of the offense charged although all three were convicted; (3) incompetent evidence admitted over the objection of appellants tending to show the commission of…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Sizemore v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- Taylor v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Barney v. City of AshlandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
- State v. SarverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
- Williams v. City of NewportCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.