Legal Opinion

State v. Zucal

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1998No. 1997-0822PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 82 Ohio St.3d 215.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. ZUCAL, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Zucal,

1998-Ohio-377.] Criminal law—Sentencing—Six-year delay between imposition of a mandatory jail sentence resulting from a conviction of a drunk driving offense and the execution of said sentence is an excessive and unreasonable lapse of time between sentencing and execution of sentence—In convictions involving misdemeanor offenses, a delay in execution of sentence resulting from jail overcrowding that exceeds five years from the date that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of North Canton v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. WalkerTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. RiskeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
  4. State Ex Rel. Shotkin v. BuchananDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  5. State v. ZucalOhio Supreme Court · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Lovell, Ca2006-06-138 (8-27-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Moran v. State, Ca2008-05-057 (4-20-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. State v. FreshwaterOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API